Introductory rates through 31 December 2026. From 1 January 2027, input is $1.50, output $7.50 and cached input $0.15 per million tokens. Cache storage and grounding are billed separately.
Claude Haiku 5.5AnthropicListed prices and comparisons apply to prompts up to 100K tokens. Above 100K, input costs $0.50, output $2.50 and cache reads $0.05 per million tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMindText, image, video and audio inputs share the listed rate. Cache storage and grounding are billed separately.
21 Jul 2026
$0.30
$2.50
$0.03
$0.85
43% cheaper
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle DeepMindIntroductory rates through 31 December 2026. From 1 January 2027, input is $1.50, output $7.50 and cached input $0.15 per million tokens. Cache storage and grounding are billed separately.
2 Sept 2026
$0.75
$3.75
$0.075
$1.50
Baseline
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
15 Oct 2025
$1.00
$5.00
$0.10
$2.00
33% more
Grok 4.7SpaceXAIBase rates apply up to 200K context tokens; higher-context requests use different rates. Batch API is not supported. The separate fast variant costs twice as much.
21 Sept 2026
$2.00
$6.00
$0.50
$3.00
2× the price
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
30 Jun 2026
$2.00
$10
$0.20
$4.00
2.7× the price
Claude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicCache reads were reduced from $0.20 to $0.10 per million tokens on 7 October 2026.
28 Sept 2026
$2.00
$10
$0.10
$4.00
2.7× the price
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle DeepMind · Limited accessAnnounced introductory rates for the upcoming broader launch. Regular rates will be $4 input and $20 output per million tokens; the introductory end date and batch discount are not published.
30 Sept 2026
$2.00
$10
$0.10
$4.00
2.7× the price
GPT-6 SolOpenAIListed rates apply up to 272K input tokens. Above 272K, input costs $4, cached input $0.40 and output $15 per million tokens for the full request.
22 Sept 2026
$2.00
$10
$0.20
$4.00
2.7× the price
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIListed rates apply up to 272K input tokens. Above 272K, input costs $4, cached input $0.20 and output $15 per million tokens for the full request.
29 Sept 2026
$2.00
$10
$0.10
$4.00
2.7× the price
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · PreviewRates apply to prompts up to 200K tokens. Above 200K, input is $4, output $18 and cached input $0.40 per million tokens. Cache storage and grounding are billed separately.
GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Sol rates were checked on 8 October 2026 against OpenAI model documentation. USD per million tokens, checked 2 Oct 2026 via OpenRouter. Comparison uses the blended price (3 input tokens for every output token). Haiku 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 prices were updated from Anthropic's 7 October 2026 announcement. Gemini and Grok prices were checked against official Google and xAI documentation on 8 October 2026.
Official benchmark results
Gemini 3.8 Flash launch results
Reported by Google DeepMind on 2 Sept 2026 · exact values
Exact published scores · Higher is better. Unreported results are omitted.
Benchmark
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Claude Opus 5
Claude Sonnet 5
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Terra
DeepSWE v1.1Long-horizon software engineering
73.7%
65.3%
74%
53.8%
72.7%
69.6%
GDPVal-AA v2Knowledge work · Elo
1545 Elo
1482 Elo
1824 Elo
1584 Elo
1710 Elo
1528 Elo
Vals Finance Agent v2Financial analyst tasks
61.4%
59%
58.6%
53.9%
53.8%
54.4%
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkComplex legal workflows · All pass rate
10%
8.8%
6.7%
5%
2.5%
0.8%
Terminal-bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding
89.4%
85.8%
89.1%
80.4%
88.8%
87.4%
Terminal-bench 4.0General agent capabilities
19.1%
11.2%
51.8%
12.4%
37.3%
23.6%
GDP.PDFExpert PDF document comprehension · All pass rate
35%
34%
37%
28%
40%
29%
CharXiv ReasoningInformation synthesis from complex charts · No tools
86.2%
84.5%
83.7%
70.1%
85.8%
85.9%
LVBenchLong video understanding · (agentic)
87.8%
85.4%
75.4%
68.5%
82.1%
78.9%
LVBenchLong video understanding · (static)
87.1%
–
–
–
–
–
HLE-VerifiedMultidisciplinary expert reasoning
54.9%
53.6%
54.4%
31%
54.5%
51.1%
OSWorld-2.0Agentic computer use · Partial score batch tool enabled
59%
50.6%
75.4%
42.6%
62.6%
50.2%
BioMysteryBenchBioinformatics research workflows · Human Solvable
88.8%
87.1%
90.1%
87.5%
79.5%
83.8%
BioMysteryBenchBioinformatics research workflows · Human Difficult
56.5%
43.5%
49.4%
34.1%
44.7%
49.4%
LABBench2Biology real-world research tasks
86.2%
82.1%
84.2%
80.1%
82.1%
81.2%
View Google DeepMind's original charts
Original chart published by Google DeepMind, shown for reference.Original chart published by Google DeepMind, shown for reference.Original chart published by Google DeepMind, shown for reference.
Bold marks the best reported score in each row.
Exact scores from the Google DeepMind model card. Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra are benchmark comparisons only.
LVBench reports separate agentic and static results for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Competitor cells span both rows in the source; they appear alongside the agentic result here, with no separate static values inferred. OSWorld-2.0 uses partial scoring with the batch tool enabled.
These are Google-reported results; keep benchmark versions and evaluation harnesses in mind when comparing other launch tables.
Score against average cost per task · reported by Google DeepMind on 2 Sept 2026
Google's original comparison of long-horizon software engineering scores and task costs.
Google DeepMind has not published the numbers behind this chart, so the original image is shown instead. Open the announcement for the full context.
Original chart published by Google DeepMind, shown for reference.
The image reverses the cost axis: lower cost is to the right. Exact numeric task costs and per-effort point values were not published with this chart, so no reconstructed points are shown.
The exact launch scores are available in the Gemini 3.8 Flash result table.
